motherboards
Video Cards
motherboards
CPU & Boards
motherboards
Memory
motherboards
Case & PSU
motherboards
Cooling
motherboards
Storage
motherboards
Monitors
motherboards
Peripherals
motherboards
Affiliates
20-inch WS, Dell 2007WFP vs Samsung SM205BW
Published:
Category:
Manufacturer:
Reviewer:

Mon, 23 October, 2006
Monitors & Panels
Various
Simon Baker of tftcentral
Discuss in Forums    Print Article    Best Price:
Introduction
Over the last year we've seen a steady trend of manufacturers moving away from the already popular and well established 19" sector to concentrate on the emerging 20" market. This has been matched by a growing demand by the consumer for a larger format and resolution, with an increased interest in the widescreen format in particular. Widescreen popularity is on the increase due to modern games, High Definition TV, and gaming devices all offering support for this aspect ratio. People are now looking for multi-purpose displays capable of meeting their combined multimedia needs ranging from normal desktop PC use to the connection of Blu-Ray DVD and XBox 360 devices.

Traditionally the larger diagonals have been reserved exclusively for VA and IPS type panels, but much like the 19" market before it the introduction of TN Film technology panels has helped drive costs down and improve the competition. While the larger format screens (24" inparticular) remain a little out of reach for most users, the 20" market has become more affordable, and with a wide choice of technologies, specifications, and features to choose from it is becoming easier for a potential buyer to find a screen to suit their individual needs, though it also has the potential to confuse.

Dell and Samsung, two of the largest TFT manufacturers in the market are no exception with the release of their new models, the Dell 2007WFP and Samsung SM205BW. Both are widescreen format, but the models differ greatly in technology, features and price.  On the one hand the Dell offers an S-IPS panel and a wealth of connectivity and functionality. On the other, the Samsung model is more basic in function, but comes with a lower price tag due in part to its use of TN Film technology. This review aims to compare them side by side and examine their performance and usability in practice.



Index:
Discuss in Forums    Print Article    Visit Various    Best Price:



news rss feed
3rd July
Green-House Releases 1.8" SSDs with IDE Interface
Thermaltake Announces ISGC-V320 VGA Cooler
iBUYPOWER Announces Paladin XLC Asetek-Liquid Cooled Lineup
NZXT Announces Sentry 2 Touch Screen Fan Controller
Thermaltake Intros ProWater 880i Liquid Cooling System
2nd July
Thursday Sampler [07-02-09]
1st July
Wednesday Sampler [07-01-09]
30th June
Auzentech Announces X-Fi HomeTheater HD Shipment Dates
Scythe Announces BIG Shuriken Low-Profile CPU Cooler
Micron Intros 34-Nanometer NAND Products
more news
Xoxide - Computer Mods

Forum Posts
23:23 by Benton
Core i7 4Ghz Club & Overclocking Guide (446)

19:51 by Doctor_Death
Hey Guys! (30)

18:42 by Lil' ½ Dead
So you want to build a PC (60)

18:15 by antw0788
Antec Three Hundred (7)

18:11 by antw0788
Cosmos S in progress.. (3)

18:06 by antw0788
nine hundred or 12 hundred (7)

17:57 by jayfunk
core i7 965 with boreas at 4.0 turbo.. (25)

17:53 by antw0788
thinking bout buying xfx gtx260 black edition any adivice? (0)

16:43 by seamless
Core i7 Proposal - Rate it! (6)

15:37 by Tisle
mybrute (21)

Latest Downloads
Casey's CS:Source Config file: V2.0
Core Temp v0.99.3
Coolbits v2.0
ATi Tool 0.27 beta 1
UsbRate 0.5
Clock Calculator 1.2
Intel Thermal Analysis Tool (TAT)
CPU-Z v1.46
What type of cooling do you have?

Air cooling
Water cooling
Phase Change


Past Polls
Samsung SyncMaster T240
TN Film, MVA, PVA and IPS – Which one's for you?
more reviews
Site Search