motherboards
Video Cards
motherboards
CPU & Boards
motherboards
Memory
motherboards
Case & PSU
motherboards
Cooling
motherboards
Storage
motherboards
Monitors
motherboards
Peripherals
motherboards
Affiliates
Video Card Memory Analysis: 256MB vs. 512MB
Published:
Category:
Manufacturer:
Reviewer:

Mon, 13 March, 2006
Video Cards
n/a
James Underwood
Discuss in Forums    Print Article    Best Price:
Quake 4 Results

For some reason - probably to do with the way OpenGL texture caching is handled by the Nvidia's driver - Video Memory Watcher would not work with Quake 4 and gave results that were worthless. Still, the frame rate results gathered are interesting enough to include, that's for sure.

The performance margins in Quake 4 are impressive to say the least. Every test sees noticeable, real world increases in performance on the 512Mb card.

The results with 4xAA and 8xAF were largely the same as those above. The difference the extra memory appears to make is astounding. I wasn’t confident to leave my Quake 4 testing at this point as the evidence to suggest the performance increase was down to extra memory was non-existent. I decided I needed more evidence to be able to assume the extra performance was exclusively down to more memory. I went back and made sure these results were accurate and that I didn’t have something miss-configured but the results always came out the same. My first clue as to why even the 1024x768 results were very different was this warning message in Quake 4 that appears on selecting Ultra mode:

Is it stating that no matter what setting you use, regardless of having AA or AF on it is going to be using near on 500MB? Surely that’s a bit excessive, but those performance figures do suggest this is the case.

I dusted off an X1800 XT 512MB and installed it to see how Video Memory Watcher reacted to an ATI card, and sure enough it worked. It would only display card memory numbers though, for some reason it would not disclose system memory usage, but it’s better than nothing! Anyhow, as long as my tests did not use more than the 512MB of card memory they would be reasonably accurate. Here are the results:

Sure enough, memory usage is sky high in Ultra mode, even at 1024x768. This explains why the 512MB 7800 GT performs so much better in every resolution. The 256MB card cannot handle Ultra mode in any resolution, the system memory usage at 1024x768 would be around 120MB and it can only increase from there. Interestingly, high quality mode is extremely efficient. It almost looks a bit odd to see it only using 120MB total for texture memory but if you add on 4xAA and perhaps 16xAF you get closer to 200MB – a good healthy number to have for 256Mb cards. This in my opinions proves that the performance increase on the 512Mb 7800GT came from the increased VRAM.




Index:
Discuss in Forums    Print Article    Visit n/a    Best Price:



news rss feed
16th March
GIGABYTE Announces USB 3.0 & 3x USB Power “Increase Your Speed, Triple Your Powe
Shuttle Redesigns its All-in-One-PCs
WD Introduces 1 TB My Passport SE for Mac Portable Hard Drives
ASUS Completes the Designo Monitor Series with LS246H
ASUS Introduces P7F7-E SuperComputer Motherboard with Next-Gen Connectivity Feat
Intel Introduces 2010 Core i7 Extreme, and Most Secure Data Center Processors
Kingston Technology Releases 1.35V Registered DDR3L Memory Modules Validated by
15th March
Review Roundup (03/015/2010)
Intel Brings Affordable Solid-State Computing to Netbooks and Desktop PCs
SPARKLE Unveils Range of GeForce 210/GT220/GT240 Silent Series LP Graphics Cards
more news
Forum Posts
21:53 by bullydog
980X @ Tiger Direct (18)

21:06 by smduff
FurMark 1.8.0 Hot Like Hell Edition Available (2)

21:03 by PruritusAni
mom needs a new computer (12)

20:57 by 4hams
Which is the best MidTower? (12)

20:55 by shattered.likeness
Omg!! Ups!!!?! (42)

20:54 by 4hams
Guess what? (19)

19:02 by shattered.likeness
[WIP] Shattered's Classified (Updated 2/3/2010) (33)

16:04 by aryan51
asus (2)

15:44 by smduff
SilverStone Fortress FT02 (15)

14:50 by Skyguy
Phenom Cooler (10)

Latest Downloads
EVGA Precision 1.9.0
DriverSweeper v1.5.5
Prime95
NVIDIA BIOS Editor (NiBiTor) v5.1
EVGA Voltage Tuner v1.1.2.1
Radeon Bios Editor v1.22
HD Tune Pro 3.50
FurMark 1.7.0
GPU-Z 0.3.8
Casey's CS:Source Config file: V2.0
What type of cooling do you have?

Air cooling
Water cooling
Phase Change


Past Polls
Sapphire Radeon HD5830 1GB
PowerColor PCS+ 5830 1GB
ASUS EAH5670 1GB GDDR5
Sapphire Radeon HD5570 1GB DDR3
PowerColor PCS+ 5670 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD 5450 512MB
ECS GeForce GT 240 512MB
Sapphire Radeon HD5670 1GB GDDR5
Sapphire Radeon 5770 Vapor-X
ASUS GeForce GTX 285 Matrix
more reviews
Site Search