Pure Overclock – Computer Hardware News, Reviews and More


Gigabyte GTX 660 Ti Windforce

Posted August 16, 2012 by Jake in Video Cards







Total Score


Price at time of Review: $319


Excellent performance, Low temperatures, Low noise, High overclocking potential, Custom PCB with improved VRMs, Great price.
Excellent performance and price for gamers not wanting to compromise performance for affordability.
Discuss in the Forum
by Jake
Full Article


When Nvidia introduced the GeForce GTX 680 earlier this year, it became quickly apparent the card was a juggernaut, not only in terms of gaming horsepower but also in the slew of features it brought along. The GTX 680 really shook things up, with features such as Adaptive V-Sync, a new antialiasing mode, and the ground-breaking GPU Boost. Promising nothing short of a groundbreaking new direction in how a graphics card functions within a system, Nvidia brought the goods, and we were certainly impressed.

Then along came the GTX 670, and it continued what its sibling started, and again we came away suitably impressed, as it made quick work of the AMD competition and was very well priced for what consumers got with their hard earned money.

Today marks the launch of the GTX 660 Ti, the latest in the Kepler family, designed to attack the mid-upper range of the gaming GPU market. The nomenclature of the card is a bit different, but we did see this approach on the GTX 560 Ti previous-gen card, so it’s not entirely surprising to see it make a comeback here. Regardless of the naming particulars, the GTX 660 Ti sports nearly the same architecture as the GTX 670, so we’re expecting big things today.

One of the cards we’re looking at today is the Gigabyte GTX 660 Ti Windforce, a sleek workhorse that sports the latest cooler of the same name, increased Base Clock speeds, and a Boost Clock potential that appears to be very strong. We’ve seen this cooler on the GTX 670 by Gigabyte, and it blew us away with low temperatures and noise levels, not to mention high overclocking and killer performance.

You’re only as good as your last card in this industry though, so the question is whether the Gigabyte GTX 660 Ti Windforce can continue the winning ways and provide gamers a strong incentive at a very enticing price of $319.

Let’s jump in and find out.




    Man 2 of these would be perfect for my upcoming gigabite build. =/


    “WHAT WE DISLIKED:Lack of upgraded power design components for serious 24/7 overclocking.”

    Did I miss the part of the review where this was elaborated on or….?


    That comment was inadvertently included. It’s been fixed, sorry for the confusion. To clarify, this card does indeed sport a custom PCB and improved power design. Thanks for the comment and your eagle eyes.


    I am a bit dubious of reviews that read exactly the same way. Not that I don’t think the work was done here but this statement of ..

    “As we expected, the Twin Frozr IV card is doing a great job at keeping the GTX 660 Ti cool, running only 32°C at idle and logging an impressive load temperature of 71°C during a heavy Crysis 2 gaming session. ”

    The other positive to note here is the Windforce cooler is extremely quiet, one of the best we’ve tested on an Nvidia card of any model.

    A lot of the lines in both reviews are identical including the part about the twin frozr.

    Both the Gigabyte and MSI cards you reviewed looked good and pretty neck and neck for performance with MSI getting perhaps a 1 framerate lead more often but yet the overcock on the memory got a bit higher on the Gigabyte and sometimes it wins.

    I would like to understand more about the VRM’s mentioned on this board vs the MSI,
    and the custom PCB vs MSI’s.

    I would also like to see SLi results of two of each vs eachother, and Sli results of them together. There is a utube video that shows an MSI and Galaxy card 660Ti together with as much as a 20% gain over a 680 that is popular right now.

    Guess I am wondering if the MSI support and following is worth buying 2 of their overclocked card with 2 fans vs the 2 Gigabytes that have just a slightly higher boost speed and what seems like less I have read support? This card is so new they have only 2 reviews at newegg vs 40 for the msi card.


    Thanks for the typo spot! We had three GTX 660 Ti reviews due at the same time, and we sometimes we receive samples at the last minute, with little time to meet the deadline. In such instances, rather than re-writing each review from scratch, we tend to use the same template for each card since they’re nearly identical. We’re victims of circumstance on occasion, and occasionally the odd typo or mistake gets missed, particulary in the wee hours of the morning when bleary-eyed to meet the embargo deadline. So no need to be “dubious”, there’s nothing sinister going on.

    As for seeing SLI results, unfortunately that’s not possible because we don’t have multiple samples of each card to test. It’s safe to say, however, that both the Gigabyte and MSI are extremely similar in clock speed and results, so SLI results will be nearly identical as well. If you, or anyone else, can spot the difference between 75.2fps and 76.1fps, for example, then you’re Superman and have our respect and endless admiration! The reality is you won’t see a difference between them.

    The VRMs are difficult to comment on, it’s a bit of like trying to compare Coke vs Pepsi; they both work and achieve similar results overall. The VRMs on both cards are beefed up from the reference card, able to achieve better overclocking and stability, as well as longer-lifespan due to them being better components. This is impossible to tell without running the cards 24/7 for many months, and even then there may be no failure to note.

    Lastly, I wouldn’t trust Newegg reviews for the paper they’re written on. Both the Gigabyte and MSI cards are excellent, but customer support is the stuff of folk legend, everyone seems to have a different story/result to tell. Unfortunately we don’t work through the retail channels so it’s difficult to comment on what a typical customer might experience.

    Bottom line is both cards are top notch, you really can’t go wrong with either. Subtle pros and cons to each model, but in the end if it means that much just flip a coin and let a higher power decide your gaming fate 🙂


      Thanks for quick response Jake. They are both excellent in depth reviews.
      I am having a difficult time deciding what to buy and I realize what you say they are so close in framerates of about 1 or less or the same with the GB one in awhile pulling ahead in the 1650 res like on Crysis II.

      I realize too that just like ram or cpu’s it depends on what you get vs the specs. But pretty good guess that any that clock that high to begin with have been sorted out for higher capable speed.

      I have some older ballistix DD2 that has to be sorted in the right order to clock higher in my old foxconn destroyer and either of these cards would be much more than my current BFG GTX 260 Maxcores as I search to build a new DDR3 system due to the 4GB limitation.
      Somehow I figure DDR5 systems or something else will be next. That GB 660Ti card did very well in anatech tests vs the single fan evga SC too. They unfortunately did not have an MSI to test. But still the framerates were close.
      I certainly agree newegg reviews mean little as you get newbie that can’t figure out to enable the battery on a motherboard and rate it as DOA.


    Actually the Destroyer has a ddr 2 limit of 8gb though somewhere on the foxconn channel it claims 16gb. Still looking.


    What is the size of this beast. My case supports max 263mm 10.4′


    Whata beast…indeed 2 would be nice let alone one of these! I think this is going to go perfect with my new cpu and mobo combo.

Leave a Reply to Jake Cancel reply


Find us on Google+